CVE-2026-92867

waiting for further signalsZero needs more public information before it can validate it.

GHSA-2jc7-xqj7-hqmq ↗EUVD-2026-89657 ↗

no check availablenot proven exploitable
cve.orgpublic pocExploit code has been published by someone. Source signals can also carry a PoC (Proof of Concept).kevAttacks confirmed in the real world.
Pgpool Global Development Group Pgpool-II >= 4.7.0, <= 4.7.2; >= 4.6.0, <= 4.6.7; >= 4.5.0, <= 4.5.12; >= 4.4.0, <= 4.4.17; >= 4.3.0, <= 4.3.20; >= 3.5.x, <= 4.2.x
CWE-787 Out-of-bounds Write
ETK-2026-91, permanent identifier
23h 28msince last run
46mAI analysisAnalysis: how long the AI spent reversing this signal.
timeline
0 = trigger signal
trigger signal (cve.org) +0hwaiting for further signals+478h
0
+2h
+4h
+6h
+8h
+10h

description

Pgpool-II contains an out-of-bounds write flaw. An authenticated attacker may be able to crash Pgpool-II processes or execute code; access to an authenticated Pgpool-II context is required.

mitigation

Upgrade Pgpool-II to version 4.7.3 or a later supported release. Move deployments on unsupported 3.5 through 4.2 branches to a supported patched branch.

check
no
exploit
no
automationDeterministic: a check that runs on its own, the same request on every target. Contextual: an agentic technique that needs to be applied per target, for bugs that depend on contextual flows.
contextual
auth requiredWhether an attacker needs an account first, based on the CVSS vector's Privileges Required.
yes, low privileges
EPSSEstimate of the chance this CVE is exploited in the next 30 days. Refreshed daily.
0.34%26th percentile
agent run time
46m
cve.org record, t = 0The moment cve.org publishes the CVE in full.
2026-09-30 07:20Z
Δ to public pocExploit code has been published by someone. Source signals can also carry a PoC (Proof of Concept).
–
Δ to kevAttacks confirmed in the real world.
–

outcome

Contextual: an exploit technique exists, but no deterministic check could cover this one.

source signals

Public signals that triggered or updated the pipeline. These are inputs for the deltas above.

  1. 2026-09-30 07:20Z
    cve_org: trigger signal, started the run

this entry in the feed

GET /api/v1/feed/CVE-2026-92867

{
  "etk_id": "ETK-2026-91",
  "cve_id": "CVE-2026-92867",
  "display_id": "CVE-2026-92867",
  "ghsa_id": "GHSA-2jc7-xqj7-hqmq",
  "euvd_id": "EUVD-2026-89657",
  "status": "published",
  "anchor_state": "anchored",
  "title": "Authenticated out-of-bounds write in Pgpool-II",
  "summary": "Pgpool-II contains an out-of-bounds write flaw. An authenticated attacker may be able to crash Pgpool-II processes or execute code; access to an authenticated Pgpool-II context is required.",
  "mitigation": "Upgrade Pgpool-II to version 4.7.3 or a later supported release. Move deployments on unsupported 3.5 through 4.2 branches to a supported patched branch.",
  "vendor": "Pgpool Global Development Group",
  "product": "Pgpool-II",
  "affected": [
    {
      "affected_notes": [],
      "affected_ranges": [
        ">= 4.7.0, <= 4.7.2",
        ">= 4.6.0, <= 4.6.7",
        ">= 4.5.0, <= 4.5.12",
        ">= 4.4.0, <= 4.4.17",
        ">= 4.3.0, <= 4.3.20",
        ">= 3.5.x, <= 4.2.x"
      ],
      "ecosystem": null,
      "fixed_versions": [],
      "package_name": "Pgpool-II",
      "purl": null
    }
  ],
  "cwes": [
    787
  ],
  "cvss_score": 8.7,
  "cvss_src": "cna_vendor",
  "cvss_vector": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
  "epss_score": 0.0034,
  "epss_percentile": 0.2652,
  "epss_asof": "2026-10-20",
  "automation": "contextual",
  "check": false,
  "check_confidence_basis": null,
  "exploit": false,
  "pipeline_minutes": 46.03817298333333,
  "t0_at": "2026-09-30T07:20:27.931000+00:00",
  "signals": {
    "trigger_signal": {
      "at": "2026-09-30T07:20:27.931000+00:00",
      "days": 0,
      "is_lower_bound": false,
      "measured_at": "2026-09-30T07:20:27.931000+00:00",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-92867"
    }
  }
}

published 2026-09-30 08:24Z
last change 2026-10-21 04:45Z

Need the technical details behind an entry?

Every entry here shows what we attempted and when. The technical details, the generated exploit that fired it and the evidence behind the verdict are not public. Tell us about your use case and we’ll get back to you about extended API access.