CVE-2026-76500
validatedZero produced an exploit or a check.GHSA-jcgq-5qqq-gj2g ↗EUVD-2026-94473 ↗
check availableZero validated a working check for it.not proven exploitableZero has a detection check, but hasn't produced a full working exploit yet.
cve.orgpublic pocExploit code has been published by someone. Source signals can also carry a PoC (Proof of Concept).kevAttacks confirmed in the real world.
Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC) 5.2(1g); 5.2(2e); 5.2(2f); 5.2(2g); 5.2(2h); 5.2(3f); 5.2(3e); 5.2(3g); 5.2(4d); 5.2(4e); 5.2(5d); 5.2(5c); 6.0(1g); 5.2(5e); 5.2(4f); 5.2(6e); 6.0(1j); 5.2(6g); 5.2(7f); 5.2(7g); 6.0(2h); 5.2(6h); 5.2(4h); 5.2(8d); 6.0(2j); 5.2(8e); 6.0(3d); 6.0(3e); 5.2(8f); 5.2(8g); 5.3(1d); 5.2(8h); 6.0(4c); 5.3(2a); 5.2(8i); 6.0(5h); 5.3(2b); 6.0(3g); 6.0(5j); 5.3(2c); 6.0(6c); 6.1(1f); 6.0(7e); 5.3(2d); 6.0(8d); 6.0(8e); 6.1(2f); 6.0(8f); 5.3(2e); 6.1(2g); 5.3(2f); 6.0(9c); 6.1(3f); 6.0(9d); 6.0(6g); 6.0(6h); 6.0(8h); 6.1(3g); 6.1(4h); 6.0(9e); 6.1(5e); 6.2(1f); 6.2(1g); 6.0(9f); 6.2(2e)
CWE-664 Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime
ETK-2026-891, permanent identifier
+48mTTV
10mAI analysisAnalysis: how long the AI spent reversing this signal.
Check if you are vulnerable description
Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC) is affected by a resource lifetime control weakness. The available advisory material does not establish what an attacker can achieve or what access conditions are required.
mitigation
Update APIC to the applicable Cisco hardening release for this issue; no fixed version is recorded in the advisory data. Until updates are deployed, limit APIC management access to trusted administrators and networks.
check
available
exploit
no
automationDeterministic: a check that runs on its own, the same request on every target. Contextual: an agentic technique that needs to be applied per target, for bugs that depend on contextual flows.
contextual
auth requiredWhether an attacker needs an account first, based on the CVSS vector's Privileges Required.
no
EPSSEstimate of the chance this CVE is exploited in the next 30 days. Refreshed daily.
0.33%24th percentile
agent run time
10m
cve.org record, t = 0The moment cve.org publishes the CVE in full.
2026-10-07 16:17Z
Δ to public pocExploit code has been published by someone. Source signals can also carry a PoC (Proof of Concept).
–
Δ to kevAttacks confirmed in the real world.
–
outcome
Contextual check: a technique exists and was validated, but no deterministic check could cover this one.
source signals
Public signals that triggered or updated the pipeline. These are inputs for the deltas above.
- 2026-10-07 16:17Zcve_org: trigger signal, started the run
this entry in the feed
GET /api/v1/feed/CVE-2026-76500
{ "etk_id": "ETK-2026-891", "cve_id": "CVE-2026-76500", "display_id": "CVE-2026-76500", "ghsa_id": "GHSA-jcgq-5qqq-gj2g", "euvd_id": "EUVD-2026-94473", "status": "published", "anchor_state": "anchored", "title": "Resource lifetime control flaw in Cisco APIC", "summary": "Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC) is affected by a resource lifetime control weakness. The available advisory material does not establish what an attacker can achieve or what access conditions are required.", "mitigation": "Update APIC to the applicable Cisco hardening release for this issue; no fixed version is recorded in the advisory data. Until updates are deployed, limit APIC management access to trusted administrators and networks.", "vendor": "Cisco", "product": "Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC)", "affected": [ { "affected_notes": [ "5.2(1g)", "5.2(2e)", "5.2(2f)", "5.2(2g)", "5.2(2h)", "5.2(3f)", "5.2(3e)", "5.2(3g)", "5.2(4d)", "5.2(4e)", "5.2(5d)", "5.2(5c)", "6.0(1g)", "5.2(5e)", "5.2(4f)", "5.2(6e)", "6.0(1j)", "5.2(6g)", "5.2(7f)", "5.2(7g)", "6.0(2h)", "5.2(6h)", "5.2(4h)", "5.2(8d)", "6.0(2j)", "5.2(8e)", "6.0(3d)", "6.0(3e)", "5.2(8f)", "5.2(8g)", "5.3(1d)", "5.2(8h)", "6.0(4c)", "5.3(2a)", "5.2(8i)", "6.0(5h)", "5.3(2b)", "6.0(3g)", "6.0(5j)", "5.3(2c)", "6.0(6c)", "6.1(1f)", "6.0(7e)", "5.3(2d)", "6.0(8d)", "6.0(8e)", "6.1(2f)", "6.0(8f)", "5.3(2e)", "6.1(2g)", "5.3(2f)", "6.0(9c)", "6.1(3f)", "6.0(9d)", "6.0(6g)", "6.0(6h)", "6.0(8h)", "6.1(3g)", "6.1(4h)", "6.0(9e)", "6.1(5e)", "6.2(1f)", "6.2(1g)", "6.0(9f)", "6.2(2e)" ], "affected_ranges": [], "ecosystem": null, "fixed_versions": [], "package_name": "Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC)", "purl": null } ], "cwes": [ 664 ], "cvss_score": 9.8, "cvss_src": "cna_vendor", "cvss_vector": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "epss_score": 0.0033, "epss_percentile": 0.2409, "epss_asof": "2026-10-20", "automation": "contextual", "check": true, "check_confidence_basis": "assessed", "exploit": false, "pipeline_minutes": 10.380536966666666, "t0_at": "2026-10-07T16:17:34.991000+00:00", "signals": { "check": { "at": "2026-10-07T17:05:32.669615+00:00", "days": 0.03330646545138889, "is_lower_bound": false, "measured_at": "2026-10-07T16:17:34.991000+00:00", "url": null }, "trigger_signal": { "at": "2026-10-07T16:17:34.991000+00:00", "days": 0, "is_lower_bound": false, "measured_at": "2026-10-07T16:17:34.991000+00:00", "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-76500" } } }
published 2026-10-07 16:54Z
last change 2026-10-21 19:22Z
Need the technical details behind an entry?
Every entry here shows what we attempted and when. The technical details, the generated exploit that fired it and the evidence behind the verdict are not public. Tell us about your use case and we’ll get back to you about extended API access.