CVE-2026-75806
waiting for further signalsZero needs more public information before it can validate it.GHSA-4h8f-fwpc-hwwf ↗EUVD-2026-89011 ↗
description
OpenSSL DTLS 1.2 connections using AEAD cipher suites are affected by incorrect validation of protected-record lengths. An attacker able to deliver a datagram to an established association can terminate that association without authentication or key material. The issue is limited to denial of service against the targeted DTLS association.
mitigation
Upgrade OpenSSL to 4.0.3, 3.6.5, 3.5.9, 3.4.8, 3.0.23, 1.1.1zj or later.
fixed in 4.0.3, 3.6.5, 3.5.9, 3.4.8, 3.0.23, 1.1.1zj
outcome
No artifact: an exploit or check was attempted but could not be produced at this moment.
source signals
Public signals that triggered or updated the pipeline. These are inputs for the deltas above.
- 2026-09-29 15:32Zthehackernews: trigger signal, started the run
- 2026-09-29 15:32Zcve.org record for CVE-2026-75806
- 2026-10-02 00:27ZOpenSSL Fixes High-Severity DTLS Flaw That Can Leak Heap Memory Unencrypted
this entry in the feed
GET /api/v1/feed/CVE-2026-75806
{ "etk_id": "ETK-2026-546", "cve_id": "CVE-2026-75806", "display_id": "CVE-2026-75806", "ghsa_id": "GHSA-4h8f-fwpc-hwwf", "euvd_id": "EUVD-2026-89011", "status": "published", "anchor_state": "anchored", "title": "Improper record-length validation in OpenSSL DTLS", "summary": "OpenSSL DTLS 1.2 connections using AEAD cipher suites are affected by incorrect validation of protected-record lengths. An attacker able to deliver a datagram to an established association can terminate that association without authentication or key material. The issue is limited to denial of service against the targeted DTLS association.", "mitigation": "Upgrade OpenSSL to 4.0.3, 3.6.5, 3.5.9, 3.4.8, 3.0.23, 1.1.1zj or later.", "vendor": "OpenSSL", "product": "OpenSSL", "affected": [ { "affected_notes": [], "affected_ranges": [ ">= 4.0.0, < 4.0.3", ">= 3.6.0, < 3.6.5", ">= 3.5.0, < 3.5.9", ">= 3.4.0, < 3.4.8", ">= 3.0.0, < 3.0.23", ">= 1.1.1, < 1.1.1zj" ], "ecosystem": null, "fixed_versions": [ "4.0.3", "3.6.5", "3.5.9", "3.4.8", "3.0.23", "1.1.1zj" ], "package_name": "OpenSSL", "purl": null } ], "cwes": [ 1284 ], "cvss_score": 5.3, "cvss_src": "nvd", "cvss_vector": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L", "epss_score": 0.0039, "epss_percentile": 0.3151, "epss_asof": "2026-10-21", "automation": "deterministic", "check": false, "check_confidence_basis": null, "exploit": false, "pipeline_minutes": 74.60780025, "t0_at": "2026-09-29T15:32:21.457000+00:00", "signals": { "trigger_signal": { "at": "2026-09-29T15:32:21.457000+00:00", "days": 0, "is_lower_bound": false, "measured_at": "2026-09-29T15:32:21.457000+00:00", "url": "https://thehackernews.com/2026/09/openssl-fixes-high-severity-dtls-flaw.html" } } }
published 2026-10-04 08:58Z
last change 2026-10-21 20:05Z
Need the technical details behind an entry?
Every entry here shows what we attempted and when. The technical details, the generated exploit that fired it and the evidence behind the verdict are not public. Tell us about your use case and we’ll get back to you about extended API access.