CVE-2026-103472
validatedZero produced an exploit or a check.GHSA-x9gv-qwcx-36wm ↗EUVD-2026-90203 ↗
description
Corvusoft restbed through 5.0.0 does not adequately bound memory use for WebSocket message payloads. An unauthenticated remote attacker able to reach a WebSocket service can exhaust server memory and crash the process.
mitigation
Restrict access to WebSocket endpoints and enforce connection, request-size, and rate limits at a reverse proxy or network edge. Monitor affected services for abnormal memory consumption; no upstream fixed version is recorded.
outcome
Mechanism verified: the exploit fired on the vulnerable build and stayed silent on the patched one, but the server it ran against was ours, so no check ships for it.
source signals
Public signals that triggered or updated the pipeline. These are inputs for the deltas above.
- 2026-09-30 17:22Zcve_org: trigger signal, started the run
this entry in the feed
GET /api/v1/feed/CVE-2026-103472
{ "etk_id": "ETK-2026-140", "cve_id": "CVE-2026-103472", "display_id": "CVE-2026-103472", "ghsa_id": "GHSA-x9gv-qwcx-36wm", "euvd_id": "EUVD-2026-90203", "status": "published", "anchor_state": "anchored", "title": "WebSocket memory exhaustion in Corvusoft restbed", "summary": "Corvusoft restbed through 5.0.0 does not adequately bound memory use for WebSocket message payloads. An unauthenticated remote attacker able to reach a WebSocket service can exhaust server memory and crash the process.", "mitigation": "Restrict access to WebSocket endpoints and enforce connection, request-size, and rate limits at a reverse proxy or network edge. Monitor affected services for abnormal memory consumption; no upstream fixed version is recorded.", "vendor": "Corvusoft", "product": "restbed", "affected": [ { "affected_notes": [], "affected_ranges": [ ">= 0, <= 5.0.0" ], "ecosystem": null, "fixed_versions": [], "package_name": "restbed", "purl": null } ], "cwes": [ 770 ], "cvss_score": 8.7, "cvss_src": "cna_vendor", "cvss_vector": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N", "epss_score": 0.0044, "epss_percentile": 0.3699, "epss_asof": "2026-10-20", "automation": "contextual", "check": true, "check_confidence_basis": "mechanism_verified", "exploit": false, "pipeline_minutes": 29.066022783333334, "t0_at": "2026-09-30T17:22:39.306000+00:00", "signals": { "check": { "at": "2026-09-30T19:36:56.695682+00:00", "days": 0.09325682502314815, "is_lower_bound": false, "measured_at": "2026-09-30T17:22:39.306000+00:00", "url": null }, "trigger_signal": { "at": "2026-09-30T17:22:39.306000+00:00", "days": 0, "is_lower_bound": false, "measured_at": "2026-09-30T17:22:39.306000+00:00", "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-103472" } } }
published 2026-09-30 19:07Z
last change 2026-10-21 07:05Z
Need the technical details behind an entry?
Every entry here shows what we attempted and when. The technical details, the generated exploit that fired it and the evidence behind the verdict are not public. Tell us about your use case and we’ll get back to you about extended API access.