CVE-2026-108983

waiting for further signalsZero needs more public information before it can validate it.

GHSA-4688-jpp9-vr89 ↗EUVD-2026-104030 ↗

no check availablenot proven exploitable
cve.orgpublic pocExploit code has been published by someone. Source signals can also carry a PoC (Proof of Concept).kevAttacks confirmed in the real world.
GeoVision Inc. GV-ASManager 6.3.0
CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
ETK-2026-2027Zero's internal tracking ID, independent of the CVE number., permanent identifier
12h 39msince last run
1h 17mAI analysisAnalysis: how long the AI spent reversing this signal.
timeline
0 = cve.org publication
trigger signal (cve.org) +0hwaiting for further signals+51h11m
0
+2h
+4h
+6h
+8h
+10h

description

GV-ASManager's GeoWebServer.exe web service is affected by a command-injection flaw on its default web-server ports. An unauthenticated remote attacker may be able to run commands if they can reach the affected service over the network.

mitigation

Upgrade GV-ASManager to version 6.4.0 or later. Until upgrading, restrict access to the web service's default ports to trusted administrative networks.

check
no
exploit
no
automationDeterministic: a check that runs on its own, the same request on every target. Contextual: an agentic technique that needs to be applied per target, for bugs that depend on contextual flows.
contextual
auth requiredWhether an attacker needs an account first, based on the CVSS vector's Privileges Required.
no
EPSSEstimate of the chance this CVE is exploited in the next 30 days. Refreshed daily.
0.31%22nd percentile
agent run time
1h 17m
cve.org record, t = 0The moment cve.org publishes the CVE in full.
2026-10-19 00:51Z
Δ to public pocExploit code has been published by someone. Source signals can also carry a PoC (Proof of Concept).
–
Δ to kevAttacks confirmed in the real world.
–

outcome

Contextual: an exploit technique exists, but no deterministic check could cover this one.

source signals

Public signals that triggered or updated the pipeline. These are inputs for the deltas above.

  1. 2026-10-19 00:51Z
    cve_org: trigger signal, started the run

this entry in the feed

GET /api/v1/feed/CVE-2026-108983

{
  "etk_id": "ETK-2026-2027",
  "cve_id": "CVE-2026-108983",
  "display_id": "CVE-2026-108983",
  "ghsa_id": "GHSA-4688-jpp9-vr89",
  "euvd_id": "EUVD-2026-104030",
  "status": "published",
  "anchor_state": "anchored",
  "title": "Command injection in GV-ASManager web service",
  "summary": "GV-ASManager's GeoWebServer.exe web service is affected by a command-injection flaw on its default web-server ports. An unauthenticated remote attacker may be able to run commands if they can reach the affected service over the network.",
  "mitigation": "Upgrade GV-ASManager to version 6.4.0 or later. Until upgrading, restrict access to the web service's default ports to trusted administrative networks.",
  "vendor": "GeoVision Inc.",
  "product": "GV-ASManager",
  "affected": [
    {
      "affected_notes": [],
      "affected_ranges": [
        "6.3.0"
      ],
      "ecosystem": null,
      "fixed_versions": [],
      "package_name": "GV-ASManager",
      "purl": null
    }
  ],
  "cwes": [
    78
  ],
  "cvss_score": 9.8,
  "cvss_src": "cna_vendor",
  "cvss_vector": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
  "epss_score": 0.0031,
  "epss_percentile": 0.2286,
  "epss_asof": "2026-10-20",
  "automation": "contextual",
  "check": false,
  "check_confidence_basis": null,
  "exploit": false,
  "pipeline_minutes": 76.98294023333334,
  "t0_at": "2026-10-19T00:51:53.770000+00:00",
  "signals": {
    "trigger_signal": {
      "at": "2026-10-19T00:51:53.770000+00:00",
      "days": 0,
      "is_lower_bound": false,
      "measured_at": "2026-10-19T00:51:53.770000+00:00",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-108983"
    }
  }
}

published 2026-10-19 02:31Z
last change 2026-10-21 16:15Z

Need the technical details behind an entry?

Every entry here shows what we attempted and when. The technical details, the generated exploit that fired it and the evidence behind the verdict are not public. Tell us about your use case and we’ll get back to you about extended API access.